Charter School Movement

What’s Race Got to Do with Charters?

Current data demonstrate that the educational system is failing our students and that reform is necessary. Many in the political and corporate sectors see, and advocate for, charters as an expedient way to turn around public education—we call this the Charter School Movement (CSM). The CSM contributes to an increase in school segregation, favors curriculum driven by standardized testing, and transfers school governance to privately-funded management organizations. This is of particular concern for racially and economically marginalized groups because charters enroll a disproportionately high percentage of African American students and more than 55% of charter schools are in urban settings. [i]While a few individual charter schools are democratic and anti-racist the CSM, as a whole, maintains and furthers a structurally racist and anti-democratic system.

What’s wrong with the Charter School Movement?

  • Recent studies indicate that a significant number of charter schools perform, similarly, or worse than their matched-public schools. The CSM thus falsely promotes charters as an effective fix.
  • The CSM exacerbates segregation in US schools and neighborhoods. In NYC:
  • Blacks make up 30% of the enrollment in the school system, but 60% of the enrollment of charter schools; Latinos, who account for 40% of the enrollment of public schools, represent only a third of the charter school population; and only 5% of charter students are classified as English Language Learners (ELLs), compared with 15% of public school students over all.[ii]
    • Emerging Bilinguals (EBs), students who receive Special Education services, and students who are identified as disciplinary problems, are often excluded from, or pushed out of, charter schools. As a result public schools are disproportionately populated with students who have a right to necessary services but are often unable to receive them because of budgets cuts, layoffs, and closures.
    • Many charters focus on standardized tests, partly to demonstrate adequate test results to maintain their charters.  Test-driven curriculum does not provide for critical thinking, creativity and democratic participation. This disproportionately deprives students of color of essential educational experiences.
    • Boards of directors that may not represent the community’s interests make central decisions in charter schools.  These business leaders turn schools into a marketplace that limits or negates participation from school staff, unions, community-based organizations, and families.
    • The CSM is supported by local government through the provision of space and access to materials/resources. This takes away funding and resources from public schools that are already unable to meet the needs of all of its students.
    • The CSM creates conflict within urban communities.  The recent NAACP/UFT law suit to stop the co-location of 18 charter schools led to verbal mud-slinging with race being used and misused.  Racially charged conflict only serves to cloud the real issues and prevents community-led change.

NYCoRE Demands:
Instead of focusing on expanding charter schools we want the state and city to fully fund quality public schools for all students of all backgrounds. These public schools should be community-based, where school governance and management of resources is based on democratic decision-making involving students, family, community members, and school staff. All students will be given the chance to succeed regardless of their performance and not to be punished with expulsion for “poor performance”. These public schools must support and provide space for teachers and staff to collectively organize in unions. They should also collaborate with each other to share best practices and improve education for all.

Citations & Resources Below (more forthcoming)


[i] US DoE “Condition of Education 2011” report.

[ii] http://www.nyccharterschools.org/learn/faq/104-what-types-of-students-attend-charters

 

 

Other Resources:

Why the Racist History of the Charter School Movement Is Never Discussed
AlterNet By Christopher Bonastia”

Touted as the cure for what ails public education, charter schools have historical roots that are rarely discussed.
Read the article

Fri 4.20.12 – Monthly Meeting

If you have trouble viewing or submitting this form, you can fill it out online:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dF94dktLY3dKdVg2bE1rc0tUcFVuZkE6MA

RSVP for NYCoRE’s Member Meeting – Friday, April 20, 2012

Join NYCoRE for its  April Monthly Meeting!

Meeting Info:

This Month’s Political Education Pieces: Cultural Circles

Date: Friday, April 20, 2012

Where: NYU Pless Hall 3rd Floor Lounge
82 Washington Square East

Time: 6:00 to 8:00 PM

Some food will be provided.

Please Bring ID

Please RSVP to give us a head count for food, and to notify security.

Thanks, NYCoRE Member Committee

 

3.10.12 – State of the Union – Part II: Next Steps Register Today

*** Register online here ***

STATE OF THE UNION – Part 2: NEXT STEPS

MARCH 10: 10am-4pm
Graduate Center for Workers Education (25 Broadway)

On February 4, over 200 people attended  State of the Union – Part 1, featuring 15 workshops focusing on issues facing the UFT in the age of ed deform.

That was only the beginning.

Join us on March 10 to help plan the next steps in moving our union forward, and unite those who came together on February 4th into a common organization.

As the UFT and NYSUT agree to an evaluation system that requires 40% of evaluations to be based on state or local high stakes tests, mandates unannounced observations, and allows for an independent appeal on only 13% of first time ineffective ratings, it becomes even more urgent to discuss how we can build a movement in our union to fight for an alternative to the concessionary approach.

We are asking for a $5-$10 contribution at the door to pay for expenses incurred for this event.

Childcare available upon email request before Thursday 3/8

For more info, find us on Facebook: State of the Union or email sotuuft@gmail.com

Here are some questions that will be discussed:

  • What should the organizing priorities of union activists be right now?
  • What are some basic points of unity that bring us together?
  • What strategies and tactics can achieve the change we want to see?
  • What is a union caucus?
  • How could one be democratically structured to include the diverse political and pedagogical views among our membership?
  • How can our rank and file chapters be more organized?

 

Why do we need a new caucus?
We believe our strength lies with our members, organized into strong chapters. This requires active effort to educate our membership about how their union works, and involve them in democratically determining its direction.

We believe in social justice unionism. We fight for equitable public education and against racism in the schools. Building an alliance of students, parents and community members as a key part of our strategy. The UFT must fight for our members and our students.

Our working conditions are our students learning conditions.

We prioritize members working together to build power in our schools. Through collective struggles, our members will gain confidence and organization to mobilize an escalating series of actions, in our communities, city-wide and nationally, that can begin to take on the bigger challenges facing our union, educators and public education as a whole.

Every educator in America knows that our profession, and our students, are under attack. The onslaught of high-stakes testing, privatization, weakening or elimination of job protections, school closings and charter co-locations threatens the very existence of
public education as we know it. Unionized teachers in particular have been singled out for demonization.

The strategy put forth by our union leadership to take on these challenges is inadequate. UFT officials rely primarily on lobbying, media blitzes and procedural law suits. When occasional mobilizations are called, they are organized without a long-term plan for escalating actions or increased membership involvement. The union leadership takes a concessionary stance in order to maintain its “seat at the table” with politicians and corporate forces like Bill Gates, who turn around and attack teachers and the union at every opportunity. Union leadership then sells serious concessions to the members as victories claiming – “It could have worse”.

Some of the key policy failures of the UFT leadership:

  • supporting mayoral control even in the face of the devastating impact
  • a weak stand against closing schools
  • a compromising position on charter schools and co-locations
  • giving up on the fight to reduce class size
  • the acceptance of rating teachers based on high-stakes tests
  • agreeing to merit pay even though every single study shows the failure of this policy
  • steadily deteriorating working conditions and power in the workplace
  • erosion of job security and tenure protections
  • a one-party undemocratic system that shuts out the voices of the members

 *** Register online here ***

SOTU Part 2 Flyer

Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com